<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Sentence Structures Latest Topics</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/forum/109-sentence-structures/</link><description>Sentence Structures Latest Topics</description><language>en</language><item><title>Source Templates - Ancestry Census Records</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/16059-source-templates-ancestry-census-records/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am a new user and am confused about how to best cite census records accessed on Ancestry.  Below is the citation information provided by Ancestry for a particular record.  Is this the accepted format now?  If so, how are the citation sentences structured?  I'm confused about which elements must go in the first citation, versus which only need to be included in the bibliography.   </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Source Citation</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Year: <em>1800</em>; Census Place: <em>Thurman, Washington, New York</em>; Series: <em>M32</em>; Roll: <em>26</em>; Page: <em>204</em>; Image: <em>200</em>; Family History Library Film: <em>193714</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Source Information</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ancestry.com.  <em>1800 United States Federal Census </em>[database on-line].  Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2010.  Images reproduced by FamilySearch.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Original data:  Second Census of the United States, 1800.  NARA microfilm publication M32 (52 rolls).  Records of the Bureau of the Census, Record Group 29.  National Archives, Washington.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">16059</guid><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:30:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Generation indicator in NarrativeChildren tag</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/15930-generation-indicator-in-narrativechildren-tag/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I love the possibilities in the NarrativeChildren tag, but is there a way to include the superscript generation indicator? The default sentence includes this number, but I can't see a way to include it in a NarrativeChildren sentence.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sue Johnston</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15930</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:35:36 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>other pricipal's (spouse) date of birth and death</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/15929-other-pricipals-spouse-date-of-birth-and-death/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>I would like to include more information about a spouse (other pricipal)in a Descendancy Narrative. Currently it looks like this:<br /><br />Blair Drayton Miller was born on 11 November 1921 at Pike Twp., Fulton Co., OH He married Edna Ruth Johnson (Edna's age: 23 years, 9 months and 19 days), daughter of Alva Dennis Johnson and Bertha Mary Rueger, on 4 July 1942 at Fairfield Twp., Lenawee Co., MI.<br /><br />I would like to have the ability to construct a sentence that would print out like this:<br /><br />Blair Drayton Miller was born on 11 November 1921 at Pike Twp., Fulton Co., OH He married Edna Ruth Johnson on 4 July 1942 at Fairfield Twp., Lenawee Co., MI. (Edna was born on 15 September 1918 in German Twp., Fulton Co., OH to Alva Dennis Johnson and Bertha Mary Rueger)<br /><br />Rather than have: [P] married [PO] &lt;([POFS] age: [AOE])&gt; &lt;[PARO]&gt; &lt;[M]&gt; &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;... I would like to see: [P] married [PO] &lt;[M]&gt; &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt; &lt;([POF] was born [DOB]&gt; &lt;[LOL]&gt; &lt;to [PARO]&gt;).. Where [DOB] is the birth date of other principal and [LOL] is birth location of other principal.<br /><br />Also, I have created a Tag Type of "widowed", but I would like to see this information included in the sentence construction along with the Other Principal's information. In the sentence above it would be added at the end of Edna's information: "She died on 16 March 1985". ([DOD] = death date of other principal).<br /><br />Rod Miller<br /><br /></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15929</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 01:32:42 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>What is the real difference between [W] and [S]?</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/15905-what-is-the-real-difference-between-w-and-s/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am a bit lost and hope somebody can help find my way back.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have read nearly everything (also Terry's explanations and examples) but am still puzzled by what the real benefit of the <span style="text-decoration:line-through;"> variable is. When should (or must) I use it to get exactly what effect?</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:line-through;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:line-through;">I understand that it has some extra flexibility (with the [sx] variants) but there must be something more to it that still escapes me.</span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:line-through;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:line-through;">Please help.</span></p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15905</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 17:09:34 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Using Age Variable in Sentence Structure</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/10519-using-age-variable-in-sentence-structure/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder why the variable [A] can only be used when you have a date such as "Month - Day - Year"?     The TMG7 variable [A] contains ONLY the Year !!!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Suggest that the age variable [A] be calculated, by TMG7, when "Month - Day - Year", or "Month - Year", or "Year" is available.  TMG7 presently uses a routine that</p>
<p>should do the job; since it uses an age [A] variable on the detailed persons page.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Comment:   I seldom know the full "Month-Day-Year" but always know the "Year".     How do I submit this as a suggestion to TMG7 programmers?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>David</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">10519</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:15:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Conjunctions in Sentence Structure</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/15839-conjunctions-in-sentence-structure/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would like to change the conjunctions that are "built-in" in the sentence structure in the Descendancy Narrative - examples:  John Cook was born in Pickens Co, <em>not <strike>at</strike> </em>Pickens Co</p>
<p>He was listed in the census report of Polk Co, AR with parents in 1880 <em> not was listed <strike>as a resident </strike>in the census report <strike>at </strike>Polk Co, AR  (remove the "resident" and change the "at" to "of")</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>I would like to do this for the whole (globally) of the terminology of my principal entries prior to printing, not individually or in editing the narratives, but get cold feet when it comes to dinking with tags.  I'm currently using version 7 but have version 9 to install and would like to get version 7 info corrected before installing version 9.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any help is appreciated.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Jo Dean</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15839</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:02:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Marriage sentence</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/15777-marriage-sentence/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Need some help and ideas please</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I would like to have a</p>
<p>XX sentence "XX married YY (widow of AA) on the ...." but</p>
<p>YY sentence would look like "YY married XX on the..."  or maybe even "YY married XX (widow of BB) on the..."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And even better is someone has widowed several times, then list all  previous spouses.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Any ideas how to do it?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15777</guid><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2014 06:07:11 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Adoption</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/10083-adoption/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Since I am adopted, and there are other adoptions in my various lines, I have given considerable thought on how to record this situation in TMG. I deactivate and do not use the standard "Adoption" tag type to avoid confusion. I defined four custom tag types in the Other group for this situation: Adoptee, AdoptGive, Adopted, and AdoptLink. I also created two tag types in the Name group: Name-Adopted and Name-Birth.<br><br>When much of the data, including the parents, is unknown I use the Adoptee tag type, and have the child as the Principal. The child is set to one of two roles depending on the two possible situations. If I only know the birth name and the fact of adoption and have no information from that point, I set the role to "Ward". If I only know the adopted name and the fact of adoption and have no information before that point, I set the role to "Adoptee".<br><strong>Adoptee</strong> Tag Type</p>
<pre class="ipsCode prettyprint lang-auto linenums:0">
Adoptee: "[P] was adopted&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;&lt;[M]&gt;"
Ward: "[P] was given up for adoption&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;&lt;[M]&gt;"
Witness: "[W] witnessed the adoption of [P] &lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;&lt;[M0]&gt;&lt;[WM]&gt;"</pre>
<p>When the parents are known, for the two separate events of disconnection from the birth parents and connection to the adopting parents I use the separate AdoptGive and Adopted tag types respectively with the parents as the Principals and the child(ren) as Witness(es). The disadvantage of the child as a Witness is that one is required to set the Preference for "Show witnessed events" to see these adoption events in the child’s Person View. As I always have that display preference set, it is not an issue for me. By having two separate tags it allows for the typical passage of time between these two events, which may even occur in separate locations. Further it decouples the two events, as either one may occur without the other. The children may be adopted as a result of being orphaned rather than due to a release of parental rights. Alternatively the parental rights may be released and the child put in an adoption home but never adopted.<br><br>The child would be a Witness using the role "child" on my AdoptGive event tag type, where the birth parents are the Principals using the roles "BirthMother" as P1 and "BirthFather" as P2. The tag has any source citations and gives details of the release of parental rights using a split memo. [M1] provides adoption details, [M2] an optional comment specific to the BirthMother, and [M3] an optional comment specific to the BirthFather. Each child’s sentence uses the [M1] adoption details and its own specific optional [WM]. This allows a single AdoptGive tag to be used when multiple children are given up for adoption at the same time. It even allows for linking others using the standard Witness role with their separate witness memos to this release of parental rights.<br><strong>AdoptGive</strong> Tag Type</p>
<pre class="ipsCode prettyprint lang-auto linenums:0">
BirthMother (P1):
Male: "--BirthMother must be female"
Female: "[P]&lt; and [PO]&gt; gave [RG:child] up for adoption&lt;[M1]&gt;&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;.&lt; [M2]&gt;"

BirthFather (P2):
Male: "[P]&lt; and [PO]&gt; gave [RG:child] up for adoption&lt;[M1]&gt;&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;.&lt; [M3]&gt;"
Female: "--BirthFather must be male"

child: "[W] was given up for adoption by [P]&lt; and [PO]&gt;&lt;[M1]&gt;&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;.&lt; [WM]&gt;"

Witness: "[W] witnessed [P] &lt;and [PO]&gt; giving [R:child] up for adoption&lt;[M1]&gt;&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;.&lt; [WM]&gt;"</pre>
<p>On my Adopted event tag the child would also be a Witness but using the role "adoptee", with the adopting parents as the two Principals using their role "Adoptor". I usually set the father to P1 and the mother to P2. This tag includes any citations such as court records and uses an unsplit memo for any details about the adoption. A single Adopted tag can be used when multiple children are adopted at the same time as a single event, each with their own unique [WM], regardless of whether they share birth parents, and even allows for linking others using the standard Witness role with their separate witness memos to this single adoption event.<br><strong>Adopted</strong> Tag Type</p>
<pre class="ipsCode prettyprint lang-auto linenums:0">
Adoptor: "[P1] &lt;and [P2]&gt; adopted [R:Adoptee]&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;&lt;[M]&gt;"
adoptee: "[W] was adopted by [P1] &lt;and [P2]&gt;&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;&lt;[M0]&gt;&lt;[WM]&gt;"
Witness: "[W] witnessed the adoption of [R:Adoptee] by [P1] &lt;and [P2]&gt;&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;&lt;[M0]&gt;&lt;[WM]&gt;"</pre>
<p>Assuming a name change, the child could be assigned either or both of my two custom Name-Var tag types: Name-Birth and Name-Adopted. This allows either Name-Var tag to be marked Primary, and either name to be used as appropriate in events.<br><strong>Name-Birth</strong> Tag Type</p>
<pre class="ipsCode prettyprint lang-auto linenums:0">
Principal: "[PP] birth name was [N] &lt;[M]&gt;"</pre>
<p><strong>Name-Adopted</strong> Tag Type</p>
<pre class="ipsCode prettyprint lang-auto linenums:0">
Male: "Upon adoption he was named [N] &lt;[M]&gt;"
Female: "Upon adoption she was named [N] &lt;[M]&gt;"</pre>
<p>Either or both Name-Var tags could be created depending upon the information available. If I only create one TMG "person" for the child I might link both sets of parents, one using the "-bio" relationship tags and the other using "-ado", and then set whichever I prefer to Primary, accepting the consequences in various reports. Sometimes it is appropriate to create two separate TMG "persons" for this single child, where each "person" has only one set of parents linked and they are Primary. In addition to their "standard" Name-Var the "other" name can be noted with the appropriate Name-Var. These two TMG "persons" are linked with the custom AdoptLink tag type, P1 as the birth "person" using the role BirthName, and P2 as the adopted "person" using the role AdoptedName. The split memo uses [M1] as an optional memo for the BirthName sentence, and [M2] a separate optional memo for the AdoptedName.<br><strong>AdoptLink</strong> Tag Type</p>
<pre class="ipsCode prettyprint lang-auto linenums:0">
BirthName (P1): "[P1] was named [P2+] following adoption&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;.&lt; [M1]&gt;"
AdoptedName (P2): "[P2] was named [P1+] prior to adoption&lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;.&lt; [M2]&gt;"</pre>
<p>Hope this gives people ideas,</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">10083</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:45:51 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>9.02 Role variables</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/15597-902-role-variables/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Reading the newsletter if sounds like the automated process is first going to try and fix role variables for us if the role is the subject of the sentence.  Is there a way to opt out of this automatic update if we are happy with our [R:rolename] sentences and don't want to change to the new [s:rolename] variables.  I can see where I will have to edit a lot of sentences back to the [R:rolename] otherwise.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Other than that, I am thrilled with this new feature. It sounds just like what we have been asking for for a long time and I can't wait to use it.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15597</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 22:48:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Preposition Cap first letter.</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/15345-preposition-cap-first-letter/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>TMG V8.08 Windows 7 Home.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Given sentences:</p>
<p>[RF:Child] is first. [RS:Child] is second]</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Child=Charles</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Output is:</p>
<p>Charles is first. his is second.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Is there any way to get the sentence to read:</p>
<p>Charles is first. <strong>H</strong>is is second.</p>
<p>?</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15345</guid><pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 22:49:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>draft card registration date</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/15240-draft-card-registration-date/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>The draft cards contain items like occupation, living location, etc. The draft card info contains only a "registration" date. It appears this date is a fixed one for the card type. How does one handle correlating the date to the accuracy of the information? For example, if the registration date is 5June1917, does that mean the occupation listed is valid as of that date? Could their be a long time delay between the date of the entry and the registration date?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If permitted, one other question. What address do you put in the place entry: living at or the board address?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">15240</guid><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:02:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Roles</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/14764-roles/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I recently started reviewing the role sentences I had previously created for the census tag and I see I have not been consistent. Some role sentences use the [W] variable while others use the [R:xxx] variable. It has been some time since I created the roles so I do not remember if a had a reason (valid or otherwise) for the dissimilar sentences. I have gone through the help file but am unable to see a clear distinction between the two uses.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Is it merely a matter of preference or are there “rules” that help determine when one should, or at least it would be preferable, to use one or the other, [W] or [R:xxx]?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14764</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:01:31 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Include [WM] in the Principle Memo sentence</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/14462-include-wm-in-the-principle-memo-sentence/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hello - I'm attempting to document details about settlement of a probate with 'one time' data entry and have those details show both in the deceased's probate tag and on the corresponding Witness details in this probate.  For example:  TAG: Probate  ROLE: deceased [e.g. John Hough (Haag)]  Witness Role: asset purchaser [e.g. John Hough with WM '1 windmill $1.62' and Samuel Hough with [WM] '5 acres of wheat ($4.25 per acre) for $34.00'.]</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I've added a unisex role 'Asset Purchaser' to my Probate tag with the following sentence structure:</p>
<p>[W] purchased personal property during the settlement of the estate of [P1] &lt;and [P2]&gt; &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;: &lt;[WM]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For eash 'asset purchaser' I've included the description of the asset purchased in the Witness Memo [WM] field.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In the Principle's sentence structure, I've modified it to read:</p>
<p>The probate of [RF:deceased]'s estate had activity documented on [D] &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M3].&gt; [R:asset purchaser]: [WM]</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In the report output for 'Individual Narrative' for the deceased results in <strong>(an unknown value) </strong>appearing where the contents of [WM] should appear:</p>
<p><em>The probate of John's estate had activity documented on 27 Mar 1862 at Montgomery Twp, ASHLAND, OH. Many of the purchasers were family members and other known individuals appearing in this genealogy. John Hough and Samuel Hough: (an unknown value). </em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>In the report output for 'Individual Narrative' for the 'asset purchaser' results with the <strong>correct </strong>value of [WM]:</p>
<p><em>He purchased personal property during the settlement of the estate of John Hough (Haag) on 27 Mar 1862 at Montgomery Twp, ASHLAND, OH: 1 windmill $1.62. </em></p>
<p>and</p>
<p><em>He purchased personal property during the settlement of the estate of John Hough (Haag) on 27 Mar 1862 at Montgomery Twp, ASHLAND, OH: 5 acres of wheat ($4.25 per acre) for $34.00. </em></p>
<p> </p>
<p>I've tried almost every variation I can think of in the sentence structure for the 'deceased' but can only get the names of the 'asset purchaser(s)' in the report for the deceased.  I have not been able to get the contents of the details in the witness memo [WM] to come acrossed into the report for the deceased.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I've also tried many variations from the 'memo' tab in the Individual Narrative report options.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hope this makes sense and really hope that another set of eyes can help.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank you so much!!</p>
<p>Debbie</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14462</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:27:12 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cause of Death sentence</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/14463-cause-of-death-sentence/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>In TMG 8.02 the sentence for the "Cause of Death" tag is "[P] &lt;was|and [PO] were&gt; Cause of Death &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;" It obviously makes no sense. Did I somehow do that, or is everybody saddled with it?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14463</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:13:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Alternate marriage sentence if date and place not known</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/14413-alternate-marriage-sentence-if-date-and-place-not-known/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is it possible to construct an alternate sentence under the above conditions?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I know it can be done with roles, but was hoping there was a way to modify the standard marriage sentence, so the result would be the normal sentence, if date and/or place were known, but if not the sentence would be [P] had a relationship with [PO].</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am fixing up a donated database, where there are about 6000 instances of this. Changing to roles would be too time consuming.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have tried several variations, but all without success.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My question is: Is it actually possible without roles?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Afina</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14413</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:38:42 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Age Calculations Using [RA:Witness]</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/14186-age-calculations-using-rawitness/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>I can't seem to get [RA:Witness] to give me a calculated age without both the birth tag of the witness and the event tag to which the witness is linked having complete dates (day, month, and year).  Is it possible to get an estinated age calculated when the dates only have a year listed?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14186</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:55:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Editing sentence on tag type window</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/14065-editing-sentence-on-tag-type-window/</link><description><![CDATA[<p>I am using TMG Gold - UK Version 7.04.  I have created a new Tag Type in the Master Tag Type List called Census1911 by copying the existing Census1901 Tag Type and renaming it.  In the Master Tag Type List window there are two boxes: Sentence and Witness Sentence.  These sentences still refer to the 1901 Census and I can't change them to 1911.  I am in Advanced Data Entry mode.  Any ideas?</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14065</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:18:54 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Rebuild All Sentences</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/14030-rebuild-all-sentences/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry for such a simple query but setting up Roles and Sentences for Multiple Marriages based on Terry's TMG Tips has left me dizzy. Terry's instruction are perfectly clear - it's me at fault.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Having mucked up Principal, Witness, Bride &amp; Groom sentences I wish to return only these to default values. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>'Rebuild All Sentences' - its the 'All' that worries me. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>In editing the Tag Type Def., Roles &amp; Sentences, selecting Principal then Rebuild All Sentences, can I assume that only the Principal's sentence is returned to default?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I understand that future Principals will have the default value, but sentences for existing Principals will remain the same. Is this correct?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm using language SS1, default English UK.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pat Dunbar</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14030</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:37:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tabulated Census report</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/14019-tabulated-census-report/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have always wanted a census report like the one below, so that I could keep up with each person's census data and easily print it out.  With TMG, I can now have such a report.  It takes a while to set up, but once you do, it is fairly easy to maintain.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Here are the basic directions.  First you need to create a new language called Tabular (or census or whatever you want to call it)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This will allow you to keep your usual census sentences, and also have the sentence structure to create this report, without having to create a second tag.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>First thing I had to do for each census tag is create new roles.  I wanted each person to have a separate role, so that their data would print on a separate line in the report.  Remember if you do this, you will need to add those new roles to your current ENGLISH language sentences.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For the 1850-1870 censuses, I created the roles Household member01- Household member10.  So far, I haven't needed more.  I then changed everyone with the role of Household member to the new role.  The Head of Household has the role Head of Household or in some cased Head of Family.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For the 1880-1920 censuses I created the roles Son01-Son12 and Daughter01-Daughter12.  The role is first assigned based on the person's sex, and then by their position on the census.  So you would have only one role per number:  EX:  Son01, Daughter02, Daughter03, Son04.  This will place each person in the right order on the report. I changed my current daughter, daughters, son and sons roles to the correct new role.   Once again don't forget to add these new roles to your ENGLISH census sentences.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now in each tag, make sure you are editing the sentences for you TABULAR language and use the role sentences below.  Remember, that roles HAVE TO BE exactly like they are in the sentences.  If your role names are different from mine, be sure and edit the sentences accordingly.  To get the ages to print in the report, I created a Name-style called Census that allows me to put the person's age in the suffix field.  This information may show in indexes, and does show in Second Site, so be sure you understand the implications before undertaking this endeavor.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Birth</p>
<p>1816 in VA.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Marriage</p>
<p>8 DEC 1836 in Williamson County, TN,</p>
<p>Groom: George L. Gee</p>
<p>Bride: Sarah Jane Rash.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1840 Federal population census</p>
<p>Enumeration Date: in 1840</p>
<p>Enumerated in Williamson County, TN,</p>
<p>Head of Family: George L. Gee</p>
<p>Possible free white male 00-05: Unknown Gee</p>
<p>Possible free white female 20-30: Sarah Gee.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1850 Federal population census:</p>
<p>Enumeration Date: 10 OCT 1850</p>
<p>Enumerated in Williamson County, TN,</p>
<p>Head of Household: George L. Gee (age 33)</p>
<p>Household member: Sarah J. Gee (age 30)</p>
<p>Household member: James M. Gee (age 7)</p>
<p>Household member: John W. Gee (age 6/12)</p>
<p>Household member: George W. Gee (age 5)</p>
<p>Household member: Thomas H. Gee (age 4).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1860 Federal population census:</p>
<p>Enumeration Date: 24 AUG 1860</p>
<p>Enumerated in Davidson County, TN,</p>
<p>Head of Household: George L. Gee (age 44)</p>
<p>Household member: Sarah G. Gee (age 41)</p>
<p>Household member: James M. Gee (age 17)</p>
<p>Household member: Thomas A. Gee (age 14)</p>
<p>Household member: John Gee (age 12)</p>
<p>Household member: Susan Gee (age 8)</p>
<p>Household member: Maria Gee (age 6)</p>
<p>Household member: Elizabeth Gee (age 3).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Became widowed</p>
<p>between AUG 1860 and APR 1861</p>
<p>Deceased spouse: Sarah Jane Rash.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Marriage</p>
<p>8 APR 1861 in Davidson County, TN,</p>
<p>Groom: George L. Gee</p>
<p>Bride: Mary A. Taylor.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1870 Federal population census:</p>
<p>Enumeration Date: 10 AUG 1870</p>
<p>Enumerated in Rutherford County, TN,</p>
<p>Head of Household: George Gee (age 54)</p>
<p>Household member: Mary Gee (age 41)</p>
<p>Household member: James Gee (age 24)</p>
<p>Household member: John Gee</p>
<p>Household member: Albert Gee (age 23)</p>
<p>Household member: Susan Gee (age 18)</p>
<p>Household member: Mariah Gee (age 16)</p>
<p>Household member: Lizzie Gee (age 15)</p>
<p>Household member: William Gee (age 7)</p>
<p>Household member: Emma Gee (age 4)</p>
<p>Household member: Robert Gee (age 2).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Death</p>
<p>between 1876 and 1880 in TN.</p>
<p>Information continues with his son:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1880 Federal population census</p>
<p>Enumeration Date: on 15 JUN 1880</p>
<p>Enumerated at: in the 8th Civil District of Rutherford County, TN,</p>
<p>Household head: John Gee (age 31)</p>
<p>wife: Elrod Gee (age 30)</p>
<p>daughter: Loula F. Gee (age 7)</p>
<p>son: James A. Gee (age 5)</p>
<p>daughter: Sarah Gee (age 4)</p>
<p>daughter: Cora Lee Gee (age 2)</p>
<p>daughter: Tennessee Gee (age 1).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1900 Federal population census</p>
<p>Enumeration Date: on 22 JUN 1900</p>
<p>Enumerated at: in the 8th Civil District of Rutherford County, TN,</p>
<p>Household head: John Ghee (age 56)</p>
<p>wife: Martha Ghee</p>
<p>daughter: Sallie B. Ghee (age 28)</p>
<p>daughter: Tennie Ghee (age 20)</p>
<p>son: John W. Ghee (age 19)</p>
<p>son: Ed Ghee (age 17)</p>
<p>son: Thomas A. Ghee (age 15)</p>
<p>daughter: Susan H. Ghee (age 13)</p>
<p>daughter: Dennie E. Ghee (age 12)</p>
<p>son: Clifton S. Ghee (age 8)</p>
<p>son: Longae L. Ghee (age 7).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Death</p>
<p>10 APR 1907 in TN.</p>
<p>---------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p>1850-1870 Census sentences TABULAR LANGUAGE</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this same sentence for all roles</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Be sure and change the date for each census tag!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][bOLD:]1850 Federal population census:[:BOLD] [:CR:]Enumeration Date: &lt; [D]&gt;[:CR:]Enumerated &lt; [L]&gt; [:CR:]Head of Household: [R:Household head ]&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member01]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member02]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member03]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member04]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member05]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member06]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member07]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member08]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member09]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:household member10]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]Household member: [R:one household member]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1880-1930 Census sentences TABULAR LANGUAGE</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this same sentence for all roles</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Don't forget to change the years for each census tag!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][bOLD:]1880 Federal population census[:BOLD][:CR:]Enumeration Date: &lt;[D]&gt;[:CR:]Enumerated at: &lt;[L]&gt;[:CR:]Household head: [R:Household head] &lt;[:CR:]wife: [R:wife]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]husband: [R:husband]&gt;[HID:]Enter children in order. If the first child is a son, use son01. If the next three children are girls, use daughter02-04, then use son05 for the next son. This will put children in order, yet keep thier roles correct.[:HID]&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son01]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter01]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son02]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter02]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son03]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter03]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son04]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter04]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son05]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter05]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son06]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter06]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son07]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter07]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son08]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter08]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son09]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter09]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son10]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter10]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son11]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter11]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son12]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter12]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son13]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter13]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son14]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter14]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son: [R:son15]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter: [R:daughter15]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]step son: [R:step son]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]step sons: [R:step sons]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]step daughter: [R:step daughter]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]step daughters: [R:step daughters]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]brother: [R:brother]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]brothers: [R:brothers]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]sister: [R:sister]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]sisters: [R:sisters]&gt;. &lt;[:CR:]brother-in-law: [R:brother-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]brothers-in-law: [R:brothers-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]sister-in-law: [R:sister-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]sisters-in-law: [R:sisters-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]son-in-law: [R:son-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]sons-in-law: [R:sons-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughter-in-law: [R:daughter-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]daughters-in-law: [R:daughters-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]grandchild: [R:grandchild]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]grandchildren: [R:grandchildren]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]grandson: [R:grandson]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]grandsons: [R:grandsons]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]granddaughter: [R:granddaughter]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]granddaughters: [R:granddaughters]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]mother: [R:mother]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]father: [R:father]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]father-in-law: [R:father-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]mother-in-law: [R:mother-in-law]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]grandfather: [R:grandfather]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]grandfathers: [R:grandfathers]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]grandmother: [R:grandmother]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]grandmothers: [R:grandmothers]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]uncle: [R:uncle]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]uncles: [R:uncles]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]aunt: [R:aunt]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]aunts: [R:aunts]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]nephew: [R:nephew]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]nephews: [R:nephews]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]niece: [R:niece]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]nieces: [R:nieces]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]cousin: [R:cousin]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]cousins: [R:cousins]&gt; &lt;a farm hand: [R:farm hand]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]farm hands: [R:farm hands]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]a hired girl: [R:hired girl]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]hired girls: [R:hired girls]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]a lodger: [R:lodger]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]lodgers: [R:lodgers]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]a servant: [R:servant]&gt;&lt;[:CR:]servants: [R:servants]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>------------------------------------------------</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I do not have multiple roles for anyone other than sons and daughters.  Any other role with multiple people attached will show everyone on the same line.  I don't have many instances like this, so I didn't feel a need to add all those extra roles.  If you have lots of nieces or nephews living with your heads of household, then you might want to add multiple roles for those roles too.  Use the same naming sequence as son and daughter to get them to print correctly.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Don't forget you have to change each person to their new role.  This will take a while if you already have your census information set up.  In the 1850-1870 tags, I made the spouse Household member01 and each child was named in the order they showed in the census.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In the 1880-1930, I assigned the role based first on the person sex, then on the position they were in the census.  </p>
<p>Example: </p>
<p>daughter: Sallie B. Ghee (age 28)  Daughter01</p>
<p>daughter: Tennie Ghee (age 20)     Daughter02</p>
<p>son: John W. Ghee (age 19)           Son03</p>
<p>son: Ed Ghee (age 17)                    Son04</p>
<p>son: Thomas A. Ghee (age 15)         Son05</p>
<p>daughter: Susan H. Ghee (age 13)    Daughter06</p>
<p>daughter: Dennie E. Ghee (age 12)   Daughter07</p>
<p>son: Clifton S. Ghee (age 8)            Son08</p>
<p>son: Longae L. Ghee (age 7).            Son09</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">14019</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:45:55 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>1930 Census-Betty Frain</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/13917-1930-census-betty-frain/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p></p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><p>1930 TMG Census Sentences </p></div>
<p></p>
<p> 	</p>
<p>		These were created by Betty Frain.  You can contact her at brfrain@comcast.net  	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence for the Head of Family Role.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Head of Family (male):    [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:Head of Family] was listed as the head of household on the 1930 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Apr 1930 . Also living in the household were &lt;his wife, [R:wife]&gt; &lt;, his son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, his sons, [R:sons]&gt; &lt;, his daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, his daughters, [R:daughters]&gt; &lt;, his step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, his step sons, [R:step sons]&gt; &lt;, his step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, his step daughters, [R:step daughters]&gt; &lt;, his brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, his brothers, [R:brothers]&gt; &lt;, his sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, his sisters, [R:sisters]&gt; &lt;, his brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his brothers-in-law, [R:brothers-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sisters-in-law, [R:sisters-in-law]&gt;&lt;, his son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sons-in-law, [R:sons-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughters-in-law, [R:daughters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, his grandchildren, [R:grandchildren]&gt; &lt;, his grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, his grandsons, [R:grandsons]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughters, [R:granddaughters]&gt; &lt;, his mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, his father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, his father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, his grandfathers, [R:grandfathers]&gt; &lt;, his grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, his grandmothers, [R:grandmothers]&gt;&lt;, his uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, his uncles, [R:uncles]&gt; &lt;, his aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, his aunts, [R:aunts]&gt; &lt;, his nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, his nephews, [R:nephews]&gt; &lt;, his niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, his nieces, [R:nieces]&gt; &lt;, his cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, his cousins, [R:cousins]&gt;  &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, farm hands, [R:farm hands]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, hired girls, [R:hired girls]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, lodgers, [R:lodgers]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt; &lt;, servants, [R:servants].&gt; &lt;[M2]&gt; 	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>	Use this sentence for the Head of Family Role.  This is the female sentence.  	Head of Family (female):    </p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:Head of Family] was listed as the head of household on the 1930 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Apr 1930 . Also living in the household were &lt;her husband, [R:husband]&gt; &lt;, her son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, her sons, [R:sons]&gt; &lt;, her daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, her daughters, [R:daughters]&gt; &lt;, her step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, her step sons, [R:step sons]&gt; &lt;, her step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, her step daughters, [R:step daughters]&gt; &lt;, her brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, her brothers, [R:brothers]&gt; &lt;, her sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, her sisters, [R:sisters]&gt; &lt;, her brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her brothers-in-law, [R:brothers-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sisters-in-law, [R:sisters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sons-in-law, [R:sons-in-law]&gt;&lt;, her daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her daughters-in-law, [R:daughters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, her grandchildren, [R:grandchildren]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughters, [R:granddaughters]&gt; &lt;, her mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, her father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, her father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, her grandfathers, [R:grandfathers]&gt; &lt;, her grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, her grandmothers, [R:grandmothers]&gt;  &lt;, her grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, her grandsons, [R:grandsons]&gt; &lt;, her uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, her uncles, [R:uncles]&gt;  &lt;, her aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, her aunts, [R:aunts]&gt; &lt;, her nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, her nephews, [R:nephews]&gt; &lt;, her niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, her nieces, [R:nieces]&gt;  &lt;, her cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, her cousins, [R:cousins]&gt;  &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, farm hands, [R:farm hands]&gt;  &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, hired girls, [R:hired girls]&gt;  &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, lodgers, [R:lodgers]&gt;  &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt; &lt;, servants, [R:servants]&gt;. &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence when there is only the head of household and one other person.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH+1(male): [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH+1 was listed as the head of household on the 1930 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Apr 1930. Also living in the household was &lt;his wife, [R:wife]&gt; &lt;, his son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, his daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, his step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, his step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, his brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, his sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, his brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, his grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, his mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, his father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, his father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, his grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, his uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, his aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, his nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, his niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, his cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt;. &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence for the female Head of household and only one other person.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH+1(female): [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH+1] was listed as the head of household on the 1930 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Apr 1930. Also living in the household was &lt;her husband, [R:husband]&gt; &lt;, her son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, her daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, her step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, her step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, her brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, her sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, her brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, her grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, her mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, her father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, her father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, her grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, her uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, her aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, her nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, her niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, her cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt;. &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence when the Head Of Household was the only person living in the household.	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH living alone: [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH living alone] was listed as the head of a family on the 1930 census &lt; recorded [D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt;, living alone. The official date of this census was 1 Apr 1930 . &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>You will need to set up sentences for each of the roles in the sentences above.</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Here is an example using the Daughter role.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[R:Daughter] was listed as the daughter of [R:Head of Family] on the 1930 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Apr 1930 . &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">13917</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:27:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>1920 Census-Betty Frain</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/13916-1920-census-betty-frain/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p></p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><p>1920 TMG Census Sentences  	</p></div>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>		These were created by Betty Frain.  You can contact her at brfrain@comcast.net  </p>
<p>Use this sentence for the Head of Family role. This is the male sentence.      </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>	Head of Family (male):    </p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][R:Head of Family] was listed as the head of household on the 1920 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Jan 1920 . Also living in the household were &lt;his wife, [R:wife]&gt; &lt;, his son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, his sons, [R:sons]&gt; &lt;, his daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, his daughters, [R:daughters]&gt; &lt;, his step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, his step sons, [R:step sons]&gt; &lt;, his step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, his step daughters, [R:step daughters]&gt; &lt;, his brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, his brothers, [R:brothers]&gt; &lt;, his sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, his sisters, [R:sisters]&gt; &lt;, his brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his brothers-in-law, [R:brothers-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sisters-in-law, [R:sisters-in-law]&gt;&lt;, his son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sons-in-law, [R:sons-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughters-in-law, [R:daughters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, his grandchildren, [R:grandchildren]&gt; &lt;, his grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, his grandsons, [R:grandsons]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughters, [R:granddaughters]&gt; &lt;, his mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, his father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, his father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, his grandfathers, [R:grandfathers]&gt; &lt;, his grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, his grandmothers, [R:grandmothers]&gt;&lt;, his uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, his uncles, [R:uncles]&gt; &lt;, his aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, his aunts, [R:aunts]&gt; &lt;, his nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, his nephews, [R:nephews]&gt; &lt;, his niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, his nieces, [R:nieces]&gt; &lt;, his cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, his cousins, [R:cousins]&gt;  &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, farm hands, [R:farm hands]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, hired girls, [R:hired girls]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, lodgers, [R:lodgers]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt; &lt;, servants, [R:servants]&gt;. &lt;[M3]&gt; 	</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence for the Head of Family Role. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> This is the female sentence.  	Head of Family (female):   </p>
<p> </p>
<p> [:CR:][:CR:][R:Head of Family] was listed as the head of household on the 1920 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Jan 1920 . Also living in the household were &lt;her husband, [R:husband]&gt; &lt;, her son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, her sons, [R:sons]&gt; &lt;, her daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, her daughters, [R:daughters]&gt; &lt;, her step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, her step sons, [R:step sons]&gt; &lt;, her step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, her step daughters, [R:step daughters]&gt; &lt;, her brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, her brothers, [R:brothers]&gt; &lt;, her sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, her sisters, [R:sisters]&gt; &lt;, her brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her brothers-in-law, [R:brothers-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sisters-in-law, [R:sisters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sons-in-law, [R:sons-in-law]&gt;&lt;, her daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her daughters-in-law, [R:daughters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, her grandchildren, [R:grandchildren]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughters, [R:granddaughters]&gt; &lt;, her mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, her father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, her father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, her grandfathers, [R:grandfathers]&gt; &lt;, her grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, her grandmothers, [R:grandmothers]&gt;  &lt;, her grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, her grandsons, [R:grandsons]&gt; &lt;, her uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, her uncles, [R:uncles]&gt;  &lt;, her aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, her aunts, [R:aunts]&gt; &lt;, her nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, her nephews, [R:nephews]&gt; &lt;, her niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, her nieces, [R:nieces]&gt;  &lt;, her cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, her cousins, [R:cousins]&gt;  &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, farm hands, [R:farm hands]&gt;  &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, hired girls, [R:hired girls]&gt;  &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, lodgers, [R:lodgers]&gt;  &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt; &lt;, servants, [R:servants]&gt;. &lt;[M3]&gt; 	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence when there is only the head of household and one other person. 	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH+1(male): [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH+1 was listed as the head of household on the 1920 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Jan 1920. Also living in the household was &lt;his wife, [R:wife]&gt; &lt;, his son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, his daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, his step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, his step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, his brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, his sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, his brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, his grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, his mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, his father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, his father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, his grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, his uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, his aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, his nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, his niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, his cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt;. &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence for the female Head of household and only one other person.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH+1(female): [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH+1] was listed as the head of household on the 1920 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Jan 1920. Also living in the household was &lt;her husband, [R:husband]&gt; &lt;, her son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, her daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, her step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, her step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, her brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, her sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, her brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, her grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, her mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, her father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, her father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, her grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, her uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, her aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, her nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, her niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, her cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt;. &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence when the Head Of Household was the only person living in the household. 	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH living alone: [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH living alone] was listed as the head of a family on the 1920 census &lt; recorded [D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt;, living alone. The official date of this census was 1 Jan 1920 . &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>You will need to set up sentences for each of the roles in the sentences above.</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Here is an example using the Daughter role.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[R:Daughter] was listed as the daughter of [R:Head of Family] on the 1920 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 1 Jan 1920 &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">13916</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:23:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>1910 Census tag-Betty Frain</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/13915-1910-census-tag-betty-frain/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p></p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><p>1910 TMG Census Sentences</p></div>
<p></p>
<p>  	</p>
<p>		These were created by Betty Frain.  You can contact her at brfrain@comcast.net  	</p>
<p>	<strong>Head of Family (male)</strong>:    </p>
<p>Use this sentence for the Head of Family role. This is the male sentence. \</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][R:Head of Family] was listed as the head of household on the 1910 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 15 Apr 1910 . Also living in the household were &lt;his wife, [R:wife]&gt; &lt;, his son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, his sons, [R:sons]&gt; &lt;, his daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, his daughters, [R:daughters]&gt; &lt;, his step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, his step sons, [R:step sons]&gt; &lt;, his step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, his step daughters, [R:step daughters]&gt; &lt;, his brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, his brothers, [R:brothers]&gt; &lt;, his sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, his sisters, [R:sisters]&gt;. &lt;, his brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his brothers-in-law, [R:brothers-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sisters-in-law, [R:sisters-in-law]&gt;&lt;, his son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sons-in-law, [R:sons-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughters-in-law, [R:daughters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, his grandchildren, [R:grandchildren]&gt; &lt;, his grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, his grandsons, [R:grandsons]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughters, [R:granddaughters]&gt; &lt;, his mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, his father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, his father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, his grandfathers, [R:grandfathers]&gt; &lt;, his grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, his grandmothers, [R:grandmothers]&gt;&lt;, his uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, his uncles, [R:uncles]&gt; &lt;, his aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, his aunts, [R:aunts]&gt; &lt;, his nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, his nephews, [R:nephews]&gt; &lt;, his niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, his nieces, [R:nieces]&gt; &lt;, his cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, his cousins, [R:cousins]&gt;  &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, farm hands, [R:farm hands]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, hired girls, [R:hired girls]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, lodgers, [R:lodgers]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt; &lt;, servants, [R:servants]&gt; &lt;[M3]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>	Use this sentence for the Head of Family Role.  This is the female sentence.  	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Head of Family (female):    [:CR:][:CR:][R:Head of Family] was listed as the head of household on the 1910 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 15 Apr 1910 . Also living in the household were &lt;her husband, [R:husband]&gt; &lt;, her son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, her sons, [R:sons]&gt; &lt;, her daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, her daughters, [R:daughters]&gt; &lt;, her step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, her step sons, [R:step sons]&gt; &lt;, her step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, her step daughters, [R:step daughters]&gt; &lt;, her brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, her brothers, [R:brothers]&gt; &lt;, her sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, her sisters, [R:sisters]&gt; &lt;, her brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her brothers-in-law, [R:brothers-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sisters-in-law, [R:sisters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sons-in-law, [R:sons-in-law]&gt;&lt;, her daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her daughters-in-law, [R:daughters-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, her grandchildren, [R:grandchildren]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughters, [R:granddaughters]&gt; &lt;, her mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, her father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, her father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, her grandfathers, [R:grandfathers]&gt; &lt;, her grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, her grandmothers, [R:grandmothers]&gt;  &lt;, her grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, her grandsons, [R:grandsons]&gt; &lt;, her uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, her uncles, [R:uncles]&gt;  &lt;, her aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, her aunts, [R:aunts]&gt; &lt;, her nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, her nephews, [R:nephews]&gt; &lt;, her niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, her nieces, [R:nieces]&gt;  &lt;, her cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, her cousins, [R:cousins]&gt;  &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, farm hands, [R:farm hands]&gt;  &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, hired girls, [R:hired girls]&gt;  &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, lodgers, [R:lodgers]&gt;  &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt; &lt;, servants, [R:servants]&gt;. &lt;[M3]&gt; 	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence when there is only the head of household and one other person. 	</p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH+1(male): [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH+1 was listed as the head of household on the 1910 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 15 Apr 1910. Also living in the household was &lt;his wife, [R:wife]&gt; &lt;, his son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, his daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, his step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, his step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, his brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, his sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, his brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, his grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, his granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, his mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, his father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, his father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, his grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, his grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, his uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, his aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, his nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, his niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, his cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt;. &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence for the female Head of household and only one other person.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH+1(female): [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH+1] was listed as the head of household on the 1910 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 15 Apr 1910. Also living in the household was &lt;her husband, [R:husband]&gt; &lt;, her son, [R:son]&gt; &lt;, her daughter, [R:daughter]&gt; &lt;, her step son, [R:step son]&gt; &lt;, her step daughter, [R:step daughter]&gt; &lt;, her brother, [R:brother]&gt; &lt;, her sister, [R:sister]&gt; &lt;, her brother-in-law, [R:brother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her sister-in-law, [R:sister-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her son-in-law, [R:son-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her daughter-in-law, [R:daughter-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandchild, [R:grandchild]&gt; &lt;, her grandson, [R:grandson]&gt; &lt;, her granddaughter, [R:granddaughter]&gt; &lt;, her mother, [R:mother]&gt; &lt;, her father, [R:father]&gt; &lt;, her father-in-law, [R:father-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her mother-in-law, [R:mother-in-law]&gt; &lt;, her grandfather, [R:grandfather]&gt; &lt;, her grandmother, [R:grandmother]&gt; &lt;, her uncle, [R:uncle]&gt; &lt;, her aunt, [R:aunt]&gt; &lt;, her nephew, [R:nephew]&gt; &lt;, her niece, [R:niece]&gt; &lt;, her cousin, [R:cousin]&gt; &lt;, a farm hand, [R:farm hand]&gt; &lt;, a hired girl, [R:hired girl]&gt; &lt;, a lodger, [R:lodger]&gt; &lt;, a servant, [R:servant]&gt;. &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this sentence when the Head Of Household was the only person living in the household.	</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>HOH living alone: [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:HOH living alone] was listed as the head of a family on the 1910 census &lt; recorded [D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt;, living alone. The official date of this census was 15 Apr 1910 . &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>You will need to set up sentences for each of the roles in the sentences above.</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Here is an example using the Daughter role.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[R:Daughter] was listed as the daughter of [R:Head of Family] on the 1910 Census &lt;recorded [D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. The official date of this census was 15 Apr 1910 . &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">13915</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Naturalization Tags-Fran Segall or Teresa Elliott</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/13914-naturalization-tags-fran-segall-or-teresa-elliott/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sentences created by Fran Segall:</p>
<p>DecIntent  tag</p>
<p> </p>
<p>role:  Citizen-to-be</p>
<p> </p>
<p>sentence:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[RF:Citizen-to-be] declared [PP] intention to become a citizen of the United States &lt;[L]&gt;&lt;[D]&gt;.&lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>*****************************************</p>
<p> </p>
<p>PetForNat tag</p>
<p> </p>
<p>role:  Applicant</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[RP:Applicant] petitioned the court to become a citizen &lt;[L]&gt;&lt;[D]&gt;. &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>*****************************************</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Natlzation </p>
<p> </p>
<p>role:  Candidate</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[R:Candidate] was sworn in as a citizen &lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt;.&lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I put the court information (e.g. US District Court, Eastern Division) in the DETAIL field.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sentences created by Teresa Ghee Elliott</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Declaration of intent tag:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>role: Citizen-to-be</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:TAB:][R:citizen-to-be] declared [PP] intention to become a citizen of the United States &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. Initially an alien resident filed a declaration of intention, also commonly known as "first papers" with an authorized court.  They had to indicate their intention to become a citizen of the United States and renounce all allegiance to any foreign state, and to renounce any foreign title or order of nobility. At least two years after making the declaration (after 1906, no more than seven years later), an alien who had been a resident of the United States for at least five years could petition the court for admission to citizenship.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>*****************************************</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pre-1922 Naturalization tag</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Roles: applicant, wife and child, children</p>
<p> </p>
<p>applicant:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:applicant] petitioned the court to become a citizen &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;&lt;[R:wife], his wife was also naturalized with [RF:applicant].&gt;  &lt;[R:child] was also naturalized with [RS:child] parents.&gt;  &lt; [R:children] were also naturalized with their parents.&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(USE THIS ROLE IF THEY HAD ONE CHILD)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Put this sentence in both sexes sentence and put in the proper pronoun for RS:child to get sentence to print correctly</p>
<p> </p>
<p>child:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:child] was naturalized when [RS:child] father, [R:applicant] was naturalized &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;.  Minor children automatically became citizens when their fathers received citizenship. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(USE THIS ROLE IF THEY HAD MORE THAN ONE CHILD)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>children:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:children] was naturalized when [RS:children] father, [R:applicant] was naturalized &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;.  Minor children automatically became citizens when their fathers received citizenship. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>wife:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Wife] was naturalized when her husband [R:applicant] was naturalized &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. From 1855 until the Married Woman's Act of 1922, citizenship was automatically conferred on the wife of any male citizen. Since 1922, women have been required to obtain their own citizenship. Minor children automatically became citizens when their fathers received citizenship. &lt;[M]&gt; &lt;[R:child] was also naturalized with [RS:child] parents.&gt;  &lt; [R:children] were also naturalized with their parents.&gt;</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">13914</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Probates by Teresa Elliott and James Colgate</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/13913-probates-by-teresa-elliott-and-james-colgate/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are many documents created when a person dies and leaves a will or dies intestate.  These sentences will help document that process.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Will Tag: </p>
<p> </p>
<p>A legal statement of how a person wishes his or her possessions to be disposed of after death.-Definition from Genealogy.about.com</p>
<p> </p>
<p> Use this tag for when the will is written.  It should be a date before the person died. <img src="http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/uploads/emoticons/default_smile.png" alt=":)" data-emoticon="" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Testator Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:] [R:Testator] made a will &lt;[D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt;. &lt;[R:heir] were listed as heirs.&gt;&lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Heir Role: [:CR:][:TAB:] In the will of [R:Testator] &lt;[D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt; [W] was named as an heir. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not mentioned:  I use this role for when a known child is not mentioned in his/her father or mother's will.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:TAB:][R:Not mentioned] was not mentioned in [R:Testator]'s will &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Codicil:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A supplement or appendix to a will to change, explain, revoke or add provisions which overrule the provisions in the original will.-Definition from Genealogy.about.com</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Testator Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Testator] wrote a codicil to [RS:Testator] will &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Probate of the estate: </p>
<p> </p>
<p> 1) The process of legally establishing the validity of a will before the court authorizes distribution of an estate 2) The legal process used to appoint someone to administer the estate of someone who died without leaving a will.-Definition from Genealogy.about.com</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Deceased Role: [:TAB:][:CR:][R:Deceased] had [RS:Deceased] will probated &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Executor Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:executor] was the executor of [R:Deceased]'s estate &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Administrator Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:administrator] was the administrator of [R:Deceased]'s estate &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Inventory:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Testator Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Testator] has died and an inventory of [RS:Testator] estate was taken [D] &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Heir Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Heir] was listed on the inventory of [R:Testator]. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Appraiser Role: [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Appraiser] helped make the appraisal or inventory for [R:Testator] &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Settlement of Estate:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Use this tag to record the settlement of an estate.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Testator Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:]After closing out the estate of [RG:Testator], settlement papers were filed &lt;[D]&gt;&lt;[L]&gt; &lt;by [R:Executor]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Executor Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Executor] was the executor of [R: Testator]'s will. Settlement papers were filed &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Division of estate:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Testator Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Testator] had his estate divided &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt; It went to [R:heirs].</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Heirs Role: [:CR:][:TAB:][R:heirs] received land or slaves when [R:Testator] had his estated divided &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt; </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Letters of Administration</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For individuals who die intestate.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Deceased Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Deceased] has died intestate and [R:administrator] has been named administrator of [RS:Deceased] estate. [RP:administrator] has been issued letters of administration &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Administrator Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:administrator] has been named administrator of [R:Deceased]'s estate &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Accounting of Heirs:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Deceased Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Deceased] has died and an accounting of [RS: Deceased] heirs was taken &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[R:Heirs] were listed as heirs.&gt; &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Heirs Role:  [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Heirs] was listed as an heir to [R:Deceased] in an accounting of heirs &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>These roles were added by Elizabeth Churchett.  You can reach her at echurchett@austin.rr.com.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>These were added for when you had a testator with multiple heirs so that the sentences read more grammatically correct.  Thank you, Elizabeth..</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For these you will need the roles:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>TestatorHeirMultiple , HeirMultiple, and NotmentionHM-the HM is an abbreviation of Heir Multiple. TMG only allows roles to be 20 characters.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Role:  TestatorHeirMultiple</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sentence:  [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:] [R:TestatorHeirMultiple] made a will</p>
<p>&lt;[D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt;. &lt;[R:HeirMultiple] were listed as heirs.&gt;&lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Role:  HeirMultiple</p>
<p>Sentence:  [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:] In the will of [R:TestatorHeirMultiple]</p>
<p>&lt;[D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt; [W] was named as an heir. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Role:  NotMentionedHM</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sentence: [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:NotMentionedHM] was not mentioned in [R:TestatorHeirMultiple]'s will &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>These roles were added by Elizabeth Churchett.  You can reach her at echurchett@austin.rr.com.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>These were added for when you had only one heir, so that the sentences would read more grammatically correct.  Thanks, Elizabeth.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For these you will need the roles:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>TestatorHeirSingle, HeirSingle and NotMentionedHS-the HS is an abbreviation of Heir Single.  TMG only allows roles to be 20 characters. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Role:  TestatorHeirSingle</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sentence:  [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:] [R:TestatorHeirSingle] made a will &lt;[D]&gt;</p>
<p>&lt; [L]&gt;. &lt;[R:HeirSingle] was listed as an heir.&gt;&lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Role: HeirSingle</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sentence:  [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:] In the will of [R:TestatorHeirSingle]</p>
<p>&lt;[D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt; [W] was named as an heir. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Role:  NotMentionedHS</p>
<p>Sentence:  [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:NotMentionedHS] was not mentioned in</p>
<p>[R:TestatorHeirSingle]'s will &lt;[D]&gt; &lt;[L]&gt;. &lt;[M]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Elizabeth suggests the following when some of the heirs were not family members.  I personally just put them all in the Heir role and then put their relationship in the suffix field of the name in 5.0.  This field does show up in indexes, so be sure you want to do it that way.  <img src="http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/uploads/emoticons/default_smile.png" alt=":)" data-emoticon="" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:TestatorHeirSingle] made a will &lt;[D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt;. &lt;The only family member listed as an heir was [R:HeirSingle]; other heirs included [M1].&gt; &lt;[M2]&gt;</p>
<p>where M1 is for the list of additional heirs and M2 is for the same</p>
<p>purpose as M in the Sentences above. (I am using it for a transcription</p>
<p>of the will).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>--Teresa's note.  I would put the additional heirs in M2 and the transcription in M1, just to be consistant.  If you do, you would need to change the sentence.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>James P. Colgate made this suggestion which I like too.  You can reach James at: jpcolgate at yahoo dot com.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:][R:TestatorHeirMultiple] wrote a</p>
<p>will &lt;[D]&gt; &lt; [L]&gt;&lt;, naming [R:HeirMultiple] as</p>
<p>heirs&gt;&lt;. [M]&gt;</p>
<p>I like the use of the word wrote instead of made.  That is why I am adding James' example.  I want to give new users as many options as I can.  And show them that you can have fun with this. <img src="http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/uploads/emoticons/default_smile.png" alt=":)" data-emoticon="" />-- And to quote James--"I do hope at least they help people think about how wonderfully flexible TMG is."</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">13913</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:30:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>To Do List Tags</title><link>http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/index.php?/topic/13912-to-do-list-tags/</link><description><![CDATA[
<p></p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><p>To Do List Tags</p></div>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>The research log in TMG is a wonderful tool, if you are one who uses it.  I was one who was constantly wishing I had. <img src="http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/uploads/emoticons/default_smile.png" alt=":)" data-emoticon="" />  My main problem was there were times when I really wanted to create a lot of tasks that were basically the same, but attached to many different people.  The only way I could see to do this was one person at a time.  Another problem was I kept forgetting to look and see if I had tasks.  What I really wanted was a way to see the task in the Person View of TMG.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>John Cardinal solved part of my problem with his TMG Utility by allowing me to add a tag to a list of people using a text file.  Notice I said a TAG, not a task.  Tags also can be viewed in the PV of a person.  Suddenly an idea began to form.  What if instead of TASKS, I had To Do List Tags?  What if the role of the tag was what I needed to look up?  What if the place of the tag was the microfilm roll, so I could use the EVENTS window in the Master Place List, to see who I needed to look up easily?  What if I had a separate To Do List Tag for each state I research in? </p>
<p> </p>
<p>  So I began to set up the tasks.  The first thing I wanted to do was use the Place for the microfilm roll. I use the Tennessee State Library and Archives (TSLA) for most of my research, and they have their microfilm collection indexed and online, so that's where I decided to start. For other states, I use www.familysearch.org. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>So the first step is to create a new place style to be used for these tasks.  If you are one of those people who likes a small place list, this isn't for you.  I personally don't care as long as places are duplicated, so this works great for me.  Your place style will need to be:  Microfilm for research and the output template should read:  &lt;[County Name], &gt;&lt;[book Type], &gt;&lt;[Roll Number], &gt;&lt;[Archives], &gt;&lt;[City], &gt;&lt;[County], &gt;&lt;[state], &gt;&lt;[Phone], &gt;&lt;[FHL Film Number]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Notice you will need to create some new place levels. If you don't know how to do this, email me for directions. <img src="http://www.whollygenes.com/forums201/uploads/emoticons/default_smile.png" alt=":)" data-emoticon="" />  In Book Type, I usually put what is on the roll of film.  Try to keep this below 100 characters, otherwise, TMG can't optimize the place if you get more than two in your Master Place List.  Roll Number is the State's roll number.  I use the FHL Film Number for the Church of Latter Day Saint's Microfilm number.  Archives is where am I going to be looking at the film.  I usually use the state archives here even if the film is going to come from Salt Lake, just to be consistent.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Then I needed to create the task roles.  I decided I wanted two roles for each document. One to use for research and one for when the document had been found.  Later as I worked, I also created a third role for when the document didn't exist.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>So I have roles like:  Will, Deed, Marriage, etc.  and Copied-Will, Copied-Deed, Copied, Marriage, etc.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I didn't want the information from these tags to print when I did a normal report, so I suppressed the sentence in ENGLISH, and created a new language for these tasks I call Tabular.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My sentences are:  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][bOLD:]DEED RESEARCH: [:BOLD]&lt;[:CR:][M]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][M2]&gt;&lt;[:CR:] [M3]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][bOLD:]DATE of EVENT OR MICROFILM DATES: [D][:BOLD]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L3]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L1] &gt;&lt;[L2]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L4], [L5], [L7]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L9]&gt;[:CR:]NOTES: [:CR:][:CR:][:CR:]&lt;[M9]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Just replace the word Deed with the type of document the role is for.  The date here is for the range of dates covered by the roll of microfilm.  If the deed book covers 1848-1852, that is what I put in the date field at this point.  If I am lucky, I will find an online index of this roll and I can fill out the book and page numbers in the memo field.  If I find more than one deed on a roll, I tend to make a task for each deed, since it makes the next step easier. All I have to do at the library is change the role name, and copy the deed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For Copied-tags, the sentence is:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[:CR:][:CR:][bOLD:]DEED RESEARCH: [:BOLD][:CR:]Photocopy in possession of author.&lt;[:CR:][M]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][M2]&gt;&lt;[:CR:] [M3]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][bOLD:]COMPLETED: [D][:BOLD]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L3]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L10]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L1]&gt;&lt; [L2]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L4]&gt;&lt;, [L5]&gt;&lt;, [L7]&gt;&lt;[:CR:][L9]&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Notice that the Date here reflects when the task has been completed.  Once I find the deed, I put today's date in the date field and the date of the deed in the sort date field.  That way my task prints today's date, but it shows in the PV as the date of the deed.  With luck, you will find more than one deed on that one roll of film.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now once you have these set up.  You are ready to order your films.  I recently ordered a marriage roll of microfilm.  Once it comes in, I can go to the Master Place List and find that roll of film, and click on EVENTS.  Now everyone I need to find on that roll of film will be listed in one place.  All I have to do at the library is make the copies.  The date field will tell me which ones I have found before.  If it is a current date, the document has been found and copied, or it doesn't exist.  If it is a date within the range of the film, I still need to make a copy.  I can sort it by date, and have the ones I still need to look up sort to the top of the list.</p>
]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">13912</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:28:33 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
