snowdrift
-
Content count
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by snowdrift
-
-
* Since a change from FoxPro as the underlying data base has been ruled out, the remaining projected changes do not appear to offer any general major structural challenges.For what it's worth (probably not too much), I will not upgrade to another version of TMG that uses FoxPro.
-
You can only import data from RootsMagic 4 by way of a GEDCOM. When the GEDCOM is exported from RM, the option 'Extra details (RM specific)' should be unselected.Sadly, none of the major genealogy programs want us to move data around... if we did, it would be too easy to jump ship to a competitor. I bet the export and re-import of the GEDCOM is less than stellar.
-
I have on several occasions played with GRAMPS, a genealogy program I consider to be the absolute best on the Linux platform, but still thought it lacked the necessary features to compete with for example TMG. Recently though I had been experimenting with version 2.2 and just a few days ago version 3.0 came out and I must say that I am mighty impressed.Ken, have you tinkered with GRAMPS in the last 2 years or so? I noticed that version 3.2.3 just came out and I like what I see as well.
-
There is a fair amount of discussion out there about the GEDCOM files produced by TMG not transferring all data to other programs (ie., GRAMPS).I took a look at GRAMPS last night and I like what I see. Has anyone had experience using it in full production?
-
I'd like to see TMG go open source, with a parallel development in Linux. And I do agree with the Visual FoxPro comments above.
-
No information has been released about Version 8.Can you point out some examples of a 'more modern-looking GUI' interface? I expect changes are inevitable, but I would not want to give up what I consider an elegant business-like interface (screenshot of my layout below). I've seen some new genealogy programs whose interface looks like a Dick and Jane primer, with icons everywhere, a lot of wasted white space, and nowhere near the amount of information I see on my TMG screen.
Virginia
While it's obviously not a genealogy database, I like the look of Google Chrome:
Interlocking windows that snap, better use of tabs and color out of the box, and use of the true Windows GUI rather than some weird DOS-like overlay are but three suggestions.
I honestly like the look of FTM 2009 better than TMG 7, but appreciate TMG's database capabilites more. I just wish TMG's interface were more cutting-edge.
-
Is there a wiki somewhere outlining changes forthcoming in Version 8?
Any chance the old "FoxPro look" can be done away with and more modern-looking GUI used for the app's interface?
-
The Mistral font is used in the "Wholly Genes Software" logo at the top of the forum (top left). It's to the right of that horrid little ink plume that is quite tired too.
I actually think FTM 2008 is better laid out than TMG 7. It's more my taste I guess designwise.
I am not arguing merits of data-tracking, but, rather, the "look" of the standard screen. TMG tracks data well; but, its interface is clunky and needlessly "busy."
... BTW, I've used TMG since 2002. ;-|
A simpler interface would attract more consumers. Maybe Velke et al are not interested in greater sales? Dunno...
-
God, I was hoping for a newer GUI on this sad old program. It looks like v6.
The app. "look" needs a revamp -- Web 2.0 style IMHO.
At least they changed that horrid default pink start-up icon. Now that was tired!
And who picked that wretched Mistral font on this website? Somebody call a graphic designer! At least get one on board for the next version...
Still Waiting For Version 8
in Older Products and Versions
Posted · Report reply
Inadequate testing using a small population is no excuse. It is merely an explanation and Wholly Genes, if it wants to be best of breed, should strive to do better.