Rollie 0 Report post Posted April 29, 2013 I want to avoid doing something dumb. Back in 1999, I entered a large number of tags with one particular source citation (happened to be source # 200 in my database). For now I am assuming that the citation details were always the same, just giving the sender and receiver of a document and the date of transmission. Sometime while version 6 was the current version, the entry for this source was corrupted in the Master Source List, but I only detected the corruption two days ago. Judging from some browsing I have done in an ancient copy of this database, I cited this source 275 times. Fast forward to yesterday. When I printed a descendant chart which included many of the people cited in this source, I got a huge number of "** Error ** Source 200." entries in the endnotes. When I look at an individual tag which uses this source, the citation details look as expected, but the source number is shown as 0. When I look at the Master Source List, neither 0 nor 200 appear. I have reentered the source under a new number, thinking I might need this. How can I best fix the 275 or so uses of the original source citation so that they link to a valid source entry? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Virginia Blakelock 0 Report post Posted April 29, 2013 I don't know if the symptoms you see would reflect this, but could the source be inactive? If so, it would not appear in the Less list but would in the More list. Virgina Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rollie 0 Report post Posted May 1, 2013 I do not believe this can be the case. No matter what it might be called, nothing shows up which is cited 275 times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites