Paul Lawrence

As I recall, captions only print in the Journal Report for exhibits attached to individuals. Captions for exhibits do not print in the Journal Report. However, all captions are displayed in Second Site.... Paul, thank you. Had the same feeling but just wanted to be sure. If so, then have to ask "why not do they print?" Peter Probably because of the way they place the event exhibits in the text, at the end of the sentence...it would be very difficult to get the caption to print exactly under the exhibit. If fact you cannot get the caption for the exhibits attached to an individual to print unless you "center" the exhibit. If you don't "center" the person exhibit the "include caption" option is not available...

As I recall, captions only print in the Journal Report for exhibits attached to individuals. Captions for exhibits do not print in the Journal Report. However, all captions are displayed in Second Site....

FYI: The correct variable type is: <[D]> Date <[L]> Location Oops, of course you are right, the Detail B is place in the Place Detail field which is not the [D] but prints as part of [L] if it has data in it....[D] is the date field as stated...

I haven't followed this thread closely but offer the following information on how TMG handles a UFT import... In UFT tags had details A & B fields...these fields do not exist in TMG. Thus conversion from UFT placed data that was in detail A & B fields either in split memo fields or in split Place detail fields depending on the nature of the field in UFT. There are default settings for this in the Import Wizard and the destination can be changed if the default does not meet your needs. The sentence for the tag took this into consideration when building the template so the sentence that appears in TMG should be the same as the sentence that appeared in UFT. Additionally, UFT had text fields for each event as well as an over text field for the individual. The text fields for the events in UFT were placed in the memo field of TMG upon import. If there were already data in split memo fields because of UFT detail A & B field then the event text was placed in the next available split memo field, i.e., if there were detail A & B info place in M1 & M2 fields then the event text was placed in M3. In the Import Wizard you had the option to add the memo field (the part that contained the UFT event text) added to the end of the sentence template. An example...the death tag, converted sentence from UFT reads as follows: [RF:Deceased] died <[M1]> <[D]> <[L]> <[RA:Deceased]>. <[M2].> Detail A (cause of death) from UFT is placed in [M1], Detail B (Death site) is placed in the Place Detail field [D], and the event text is placed in the next split memo field [M2]. See correction to the above in message below ([D] is not Place Detail but is date, Place Detail is part of [L]) Hope this helps in explaining how the import of UFT data worked... As for you other question concerning the placement of endnote (footnote) numbers, TMG places them all at the end of the sentence like UFT. Some users utilized the Surety fields to indicated what the citation refers to, i.e. the surety fields are 1, 2, D, P, M....Principal 1 and 2, Date, Place, or Memo....

Note the ID# of the father...go to the detail view of the son...double click on Father at top of Detail View of son...enter ID# of father in Parent field....

You accent people not tags....there is currently no provision for accenting tag types although it has been requested by others...

If the "town" is in a place field go to the Master Place List and correct...it will correct it everywhere it is used.... If it is in a memo field use TMG Utility to do a Search and Replace....

The spouse shown is the "last view" spouse...to set the "last view" spouse go to the individual, switch to the Tree or Family view and click on "Next" in the lower left until the spouse you want to show is shown.

In my tests of cutting and pasting from Word or WordPerfect the double spaces are not change to one....however, double spacing at the end of a sentence is outdated. Most print uses proportional spacing and does not require two spaces at the end of sentence. The two spaces were standard when using a typewriter which as fixed spacing and I imagine would be acceptable if using a fixed font like Courier, but I'm no expert and could be wrong...

I don't believe you filter a filter list. If you want to filter on mulitple criteria you have to combine the criteria into one filter...

There is not need for a primary designation for event exhibits. The primary designation for exhibits attached to an individual designates which exhibit shows in the Exhibit window and which exhibit shows for an individual in some reports. You cannot designate an event exhibit to show in the Exhibit window.

Only exhibits attached to an individual can be designated primary...exhibits attached to an event cannot be designated primary...

(****) Better yet is available...add the <[PAR]> parameter to the birth sentence (see Help under Variables (Event Tags)...the varialbe <[PARO]> is included in the marriage tag to get the parents of the spouse... BE AWARE that if you add the variable to the birth sentence in SS you must uncheck "Add Parent Sentence" under Pages>Format or you will get the parents repeated twice....

You are right, I believe it is the standard in most style manuals...

Citation details can only be used in Full Footnotes and Short Footnotes. Bibliographies do not use citation details...Keep in mind that a bibliography can refer to multiple citations using the source thus cannot use citation details as it wouldn't know which one to use...

Flags are listed in the order they appear in the Flag Manager and in the Flag Window...disabled flags are included in the listing...

File / Preferences / Program Options / Tag Box / 'Undated tags sorted' list box / Choose 'Bottom' That will control where they display in the tag box....to control where they print you must use sort dates...

Thanks...working now... Except heading says 2 July 2007, Early Session... is it the right one???

In trying to read the Last session transcript I get message "Too many arguments" No problem with early session....

http://www.lawrencefamhis.com/ Besides extensive information on the Lawrences of Ashton Hall, Lancashire, England and descendants of Robert Lawrence of Isle of Wight Co., Virginia, other family pages are include for the following surnames: Bondurant, Boone, Brown (Braun), Bumpass, Burnett, Byerly, Daniel, Daughter, Hardy, Harper, Harr, Hinton, Hill, Kincaid, Leonard, McMurry, Mullins, Rose, Sloan, Stansbury, Towne, and Wilhoite/Wilhite. Site was created 100% with Second Site include the home page that links to all other family pages.

Paul: Have you looked at the following data? http://geneweb.inria.fr/roglo?lang=en;i=2395034 There is some added ancestry of the Joyeuse/Retz, ancestors of the Bondurant, maybe others. Have used this website for over a decade and have found it to be unusually reliable. They also have a good forum. Good luck, Mike Talbot No, I haven't...I will take a look at it and see if there is any info I can use Thanks....

I think you should set up the [AUTHOR] field as Weis, Frederick Lewis; Sheppard Jr., Walter Lee Then FF, SF, and BIB will correctly print the names...

You can set a flag on individuals in TMG that you want to appear on your web site and have SS include only those individuals with the flag set...no need to copy and delete....

Click on Help>Technical Support for instructions...there is a way to submit a trouble report....

I have wanted to include spouse data in journal reports, not just BMD data but other data as well. This can help create a more complete view of the family and can help keep people with similar names separate when reading your report. In Descendant reports, it is also useful to include spouse data for every one. For example, if a descendant dies with a young family, that person's spouse may have census tags, etc which describe the family after the descendant's death. Ultimate Family Tree has an option "include all spouse data". This does create a lot of redundant text for ancestors and their spouses in an ancestor report, but gives a more complete picture of families. It would be nice if TMG provided options to do something similar. Does any one else care for this feature? Pierce Did you check "Include spouse events" on the Miscellaneous tab under Format?