eegriff

Follow-up Terry, I examined the GEDCOM listing for the example I cited earlier of a man who was married three times. There are three FAMS listings for him and each correctly identifies one of the three WIFEs. However, one of them does not include a MARR/DATE GEDCOM entry as expected. (This explains why World Connect parsed it the way they did.) I looked at that person's data again and see no reason why the MARR/DATE GEDCOM tags are not present in the export. There are clearly three "Marriage" tags, with dates. Can you suggest what might be happening or what setting I might have inadvertantly placed in the file or the export to cause this?

Thanks, Terry. It helps knowing that "it's not my fault".

When I export my TMG6 file as GEDCOM 5.5 and then upload it to Rootsweb, the final marriage order is incorrect. In one particular case, a man was married three times and each of the three marriages has a date. However, the final order on Rootsweb is not in date order, and one of the marriage dates is missing. The final order is not by ID number either, nor have I changed the default sentence structure. This is not so important to me personally, since I can see the correct data in TMG. However, when I publish my work, as to Rootsweb, I do not want to offend people who see a relative with incorrect marriage information. I didn't see an option to explicity declare a "marriage order" and assumed that the date field would be sufficient to decide who is Spouse 1, 2 and 3. What am I missing?