Jump to content


Photo

Will


  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 GenerationGoneBy

GenerationGoneBy
  • Senior Members
  • 887 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 22 May 2008 - 05:43 AM

Testator: [:CR:][:TAB:] [R:Testator] wrote his will <[D]> < [L]>. <[R:heir] were listed as heirs.>< [R:Named Slave] was mentioned as slaves he owned.>< [R:executor] was named as executor of the will.><[M]>[:NP:]

Female: [:CR:][:TAB:] [R:Testator] wrote her will <[D]> < [L]>. <[R:heir] were listed as heirs.>< [R:Named Slave] was mentioned as slaves she owned.>< [R:executor] was named as executor of the will.><[M]>[:NP:]

heir: [:CR:][:TAB:] When [R:Testator] wrote his will <[D]> < [L]>, [W] was named as an heir. <[WM]> <[M0]>


Not mentioned: [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Not mentioned] was not mentioned in [R:Testator]'s will that was written <[D]> < [L]>. <[M]>

Will Witness: [:CR:][:TAB:][R:Will Witness] witnessed the will of [R:Testator] <[D]> < [L]>. <[M]>

Already deceased: [:CR:][:TAB:] [R:Testator] wrote his will <[D]> < [L]>. [W] was already deceased. <[WM]>

Female [:CR:][:TAB:] [R:Testator] wrote her will <[D]> < [L]>. [W] was already deceased. <[WM]>

Named Slave: [:CR:][:TAB:] [R:Testator] wrote his will <[D]> < [L]>. <[W] was listed as a slave.><[M]>

executor: [:CR:][:TAB:]In [R:Testator]'s will, [R:executor] was named by [RF:Testator] to handle [RS:Testator] estate <[D]> < [L]>. <[M].>


Notes: I use SS, so you may get different output using the [R:heir] role in SS than you do in TMG. If you use reference numbers after the name, then you will get weird output when you use [R:Testator]'s.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users